X: Titanic or Phoenix?

Four years after Twitter became X, the product has a new name, a new owner above its owner, a new algorithm and a new subscription. What it still lacks is a clear map. By Djekyll (@HeyDjekyll) Disclosure: this article was researched and drafted with the help of Grok Bot, an AI assistant made by SpaceXSI, the company that now owns X and sells the subscription discussed below. Every claim is linked to its source so you can check it yourself.

They named the algorithm Phoenix. That is not a metaphor I made up. In X's open-source For You code, the model that ranks your feed is literally called Phoenix: it "reads the viewer's recent engagement history and predicts, for each post, how likely the viewer is to take each action on it." The rest of the ship, though, still looks a bit like the Titanic. Not because it is sinking (I have no verified numbers that say so), but because of how many compartments it has, and how few of them are labeled. I'm a developer and an X user. This is not a hit piece. It is an attempt to put, in one place and with sources, what a paying customer or a developer actually has to understand to use this product today. Each section ends with a quick read: signs of sinking, signs of rebirth. I tried to be fair to both.

1. The acquisition and the purge (2022)

Elon Musk acquired Twitter in October 2022. SpaceX's own SEC filing states it plainly: "Twitter, Inc. ('Twitter') was acquired by Mr. Elon Musk in October 2022." One week later came the layoffs. On November 4, 2022, Twitter's then head of safety and integrity, Yoel Roth, confirmed that 50% of employees had been laid off, according to Reuters. The AP put it at about half of a staff of 7,500. Musk's stated reason, quoted by Reuters: "there is no choice when the company is losing over $4M/day." ~50% of Twitter's staff laid off on November 4, 2022, one week after the takeover. By July 2025, the New York Times summarized it this way: Musk "has shed three quarters of the company's employees." The same month, the first paid product of the new era arrived. Twitter Blue relaunched at $7.99 a month with a blue check mark included. The check mark stopped meaning "verified notable account" and started meaning "subscriber." Signs of sinking: a company cut in half in a week, with the identity signal everyone relied on put up for sale. Signs of rebirth: a clear new thesis. Users would pay, and the product would be rebuilt around that.

2. Renaming is not redirecting

On July 24, 2023, the bird left. Twitter replaced its logo with an X (Reuters has the same story). A few weeks later, Twitter Blue became X Premium. A rename is a decision. A migration is a project. The two are not the same thing, and I will come back to that in section 3.

A CEO, then not

Linda Yaccarino joined in May 2023, when the company was still called Twitter. From the start, there were questions about how much of the product she actually ran. In August 2023, Business Insider reported that "some X employees said they see Yaccarino as a CEO in name only." A month later, on stage at the Code Conference, CNBC's Julia Boorstin asked her about it directly. Her answer, as reported by TechCrunch: "Yeah, not nice," followed by "[Musk] runs product. He runs technology." On July 9, 2025, she announced she was stepping down after two years. She did not give a reason. So who runs X today? This is harder to answer than it should be. Two months after Yaccarino left, Fast Company reported that the CEO seat was still empty and that X declined to comment on the search. Nikita Bier led product from July 2025. On August 5, 2026, he stepped down to become an advisor. According to The Verge, the "next leaders" he named are Benji Taylor for design, with iOS lead Jonah Katz and Mridul Singhai leading product. In the sources I checked, I found no announcement of a new CEO for X since July 2025. I am not going to guess at who decides what. I will only note that a paying customer who wants to know who is accountable for the product they pay for has to piece it together from news coverage. Signs of sinking: a captain's chair that has been empty for over a year, in public. Signs of rebirth: product leadership has been named in public, and it ships.

3. The unfinished migration

Three years after the rebrand, I checked a handful of Twitter-era addresses myself on October 14, 2026, with plain HTTP requests. Here is what I found. What works well. Most legacy addresses redirect cleanly: twitter.com redirects to x.com. about.twitter.com and business.twitter.com redirect to their x.com equivalents. legal.twitter.com ends up at x.com/en/tos. developer.twitter.com/en/docs redirects to the new home, docs.x.com. What doesn't. developer.twitter.com itself does not redirect. It returns a 200 and serves a page titled "X Developer Platform," on the old domain, with a favicon file named twitter.3.ico. dev.twitter.com redirects... to developer.twitter.com. One old Twitter domain forwarding to another. The API's resources are still named after tweets. The examples on Make Your First Request use paths like api.x.com/2/tweets/.... The "Post" is still a "tweet" at the URL level. The Create Posts documentation page, on the new docs.x.com domain, still contains https://api.twitter.com/2/problems/... error type URIs next to api.x.com endpoints. The 2026 algorithm code, published by xAI, still uses Twitter's package names. For example, ValidUserInfo.scala opens with package com.twitter.health.platform_manipulation.user_cred_v2. The 2023 algorithm still lives under the twitter GitHub organization, with the description "Source code for the X Recommendation Algorithm." To be fair: renaming an API's resource paths would break every client in the world, so /2/tweets staying put is a defensible engineering choice. Package names inside old code are harmless. None of this is a security problem. But it is visible, and it adds up. If a mid-size software company left its developer portal on a retired brand three years after a rename, its customers would call that unfinished. Size and wealth don't change that standard. They only raise expectations. 3 years after the rebrand, developer.twitter.com still serves the "X Developer Platform" on the old domain, without redirecting. Signs of sinking: old bulkheads still carrying the old ship's name. Signs of rebirth: the new docs site exists, is well organized, and most old doors lead to it.

4. Nesting dolls

If you are an X customer, here is who you are a customer of, as of today.

March 28, 2025: xAI, Musk's AI company, acquired X in an all-stock deal valuing X at $33 billion and xAI at $80 billion. Musk wrote: "xAI and X's futures are intertwined." February 2, 2026: SpaceX acquired xAI. Reuters reported a valuation of $1 trillion for SpaceX and $250 billion for xAI. SpaceX's SEC filing confirms the chain: X Holdings Corp. became a subsidiary of xAI, and xAI became a wholly owned subsidiary of SpaceX. April to August 2026: SpaceX first secured the right to buy Cursor for $60 billion, signed a binding deal in June, and on August 14, 2026, Cursor announced it was officially part of SpaceX. July and October 2026: the AI business took the name SpaceXAI in July, then on October 10 its X account became @SpaceXSI, "SpaceX Super Intelligence". The same report notes it was not yet clear whether legal entity names would follow. So: a social network, inside an AI company, inside a rocket company, which also owns a code editor. Each layer may make sense on its own. Stacked, they make one simple question ("who am I paying, and for what?") surprisingly hard to answer. Signs of sinking: four renames (Twitter, Blue, xAI, SpaceXAI) and four acquisitions (Twitter, X, xAI, Cursor) in four years. Signs of rebirth: the stack now has real assets in it: compute, models, and what Reuters calls "the popular AI coding agent Cursor." That is more than a social network with a logo problem.

5. The subscription jungle

Here is every paid name I could verify, in order of appearance: Twitter Blue (Nov 2022) X Premium (Aug 2023), later split into Basic, Premium and Premium+ (help page) Grok, xAI's assistant, announced with "real-time knowledge of the world via the 𝕏 platform"

SuperGrok, and then SuperGrok Heavy, introduced with Grok 4

Premium Business and Premium Organizations, the current names for what the help page earlier called Verified Organizations The X Subscription, announced in October 2026 (announcement; TechCrunch covered it on October 13), with five tiers: Free ($0): Daily Grok, a Cursor starter allowance, "standard X" Plus ($8/month): More AI usage, plus "a checkmark, creator tools, and fewer ads on X" Premium ($30/month): "The benefits of SuperGrok, Cursor Pro, and X Premium+, previously $90/month combined"

Super ($100/month): 15x the Plus usage

Ultra ($200/month): 50x the Plus usage

Source: x.ai/news/x-subscription. Existing subscribers can keep their current plans. "Premium" now means two things This is the part that I think deserves a fix, not a debate. On X's own help page, as archived on October 10, 2026, Premium is the middle tier of X Premium, at $8/month in the US. In The X Subscription, Premium is the $30/month tier. Meanwhile, the $8 slot in the new lineup is called Plus.

Same word, same company, same month, two prices. And if you are looking at the old Premium+, its US price on that same help page went from $22/month in January 2025 to $40/month in October 2026. Even careful coverage tripped on the details. Engadget's write-up gives Ultra "20 times the usage capacity of Plus." The official page says 50x. When professional tech journalists can't keep the tiers straight, I don't think the problem is the readers. 2 prices for the word "Premium" on X's own pages in October 2026: $8 and $30. Signs of sinking: six product families, overlapping names, and a help center that describes a lineup the company is now replacing. Signs of rebirth: the bundle itself is a real simplification on paper, and the company says "each comparable new tier provides more usage-per-dollar than the plan it replaces." If the docs catch up, this could be the cleanest offer X has ever had.

6. The promise and the fine print

What does a subscription actually do for your reach? X's answer has changed over time, and it has never been very precise.

What the help page promised

The 2025 version of the X Premium help page sells "reply prioritization" for Basic, "larger reply prioritization" for Premium, and "largest reply prioritization" for Premium+. The October 2026 snapshot still uses the same three phrases. How does it work? The 2025 page's FAQ says that "people on X will see a slight preference for replies from verified accounts over other replies" and that "we're currently testing the levels at which we prioritize content from Premium subscribers relative to the other factors we consider in conversation rankings." So: slight, and still being tested. No numbers.

What the new subscription page lists

The X Subscription announcement describes what X adds as: "a checkmark, creator tools, and fewer ads, with higher tiers removing ads from the timeline entirely." There is no mention of reply prioritization, ranking, or reach.

What the terms say

The X Purchaser Terms of Service (effective August 1, 2025) are unambiguous: "We make no guarantee as to the nature, quality, or value of a Paid Service or the availability or supply thereof." And: "YOU UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE PAID SERVICES ARE PROVIDED TO YOU ON AN 'AS IS' AND 'AS AVAILABLE' BASIS." That is standard legal language, and I'm not suggesting anything improper about it. But it is worth reading next to the marketing.

What outside data suggests

Buffer analyzed 18.8 million posts from 71,000 accounts between August 2024 and August 2025. Its findings on median reach per post: Regular accounts: "typically under 100 impressions per post" Premium accounts: "closer to 600 impressions per post" Premium+ accounts: "over 1,550 impressions per post"

~10x the median reach for Premium accounts versus regular ones, in Buffer's dataset. Buffer also found that the median engagement rate for regular accounts was 0%, meaning "at least half of these accounts received no likes, replies, or reposts on their posts." A caveat matters here, and Buffer's own summary line states it: "Higher X Premium tiers correlate with stronger visibility." Correlation. People who pay for Premium+ may also post more, post better, or have larger audiences. Buffer says follower size "alone doesn't account for the difference," but the study doesn't isolate the subscription as the cause. Signs of sinking: a paid product whose most discussed benefit, reach, is one the seller won't quantify and the terms won't guarantee. Signs of rebirth: the code is now public, so this is a question that can actually be checked. Which brings us to section 8.

7. API and automation

For developers, the timeline is short and steep: February 2023: Twitter announced it would stop providing free API access from February 9. March 2023: new tiers. Free became write-only (1,500 tweets per month), and Basic cost $100 per month. October 2024: Basic doubled to $200 per month (Social Media Today covered it too). February 2026: X moved to pay-per-use pricing: for example $0.005 per post read, $0.010 per user profile, $0.010 per post created. $0 to $200/month for the entry API tier between February 2023 and October 2024. Then pay-per-use. Pay-per-use is, honestly, a good change for small developers. You pay for what you use, with no fixed monthly floor.

Strict rules for an API sold to everyone

What comes with that access is a set of strict rules on automation. X's Developer Guidelines ask, in a checklist: "Is your app's purpose and behavior clear to users? (Automated accounts must be labeled.)" The Developer Policy says: "If you're operating an API-based bot account you must clearly indicate what the account is and who is responsible for it. You should never mislead or confuse people about whether your account is or is not a bot." I don't see a contradiction there. Selling API access to anyone while requiring every automated account to identify itself is a coherent position. It is also a demanding one: the rules are strict, the API is open to anyone with a card, and the label is the main line of defense between the two. Enforcement is what makes that model work, and enforcement is not something I can verify from the outside. Signs of sinking: three pricing models in three years for the people who build on the platform. Signs of rebirth: the current model is the most flexible yet, and the rules on bots are clear and written down.

1. Which algorithm counts?

There are two public repositories that each describe themselves as X's recommendation algorithm. twitter/the-algorithm was created in March 2023. Its README describes it as the services that serve "feeds of posts and other content across all X product surfaces (e.g. For You Timeline, Search, Explore, Notifications)." It is not archived, and it was last updated in September 2025. xai-org/x-algorithm was created in January 2026. Its README says it "contains the core code that determines which posts a viewer sees in the For You feed on X," ranked by "a transformer model": Phoenix. The newer repo is active and, to its credit, unusually candid. It keeps a dated changelog. It explains in plain language how its ranking weights work, including a note that a report having "468 times higher weight than a like" does not mean "1 report cancels out 468 likes." It ships a transparency tool, Under the Hood, that shows people the visibility labels applied to their own account. It even documents a Brazil election filter, with the line: "A benefit of open-source is that you can see that changes like this exist, and exactly how they work." That is the Phoenix part, and I mean it as a compliment. What is missing is a sentence telling the reader which repository is authoritative today, and what happened to the other one. Signs of sinking: two "official" algorithms, neither pointing to the other. Signs of rebirth: the newest one is more open than what most large platforms publish.

9. Said vs. shipped

Here is where I put what X says next to what its own code, docs and terms show. I only included pairs I could verify myself, with two precise sources each. Where the code is consistent with the claim, I say so.

9.1 The subscription boost: described as "slight," shipped as a dial

Said: the help page promises "slight preference for replies from verified accounts" and says X is "currently testing the levels" (help page, 2025 snapshot). Shipped (2023): the July 2023 update of the For You code added two parameters for blue-verified authors with default values of 4.0 in-network and 2.0 out-of-network (BlueVerifiedAuthorInNetworkMultiplierParam, BlueVerifiedAuthorOutOfNetworkMultiplierParam). Shipped (now): those parameters are gone from the current version of that file. In the 2026 repo, the For You weights file contains no term mentioning verification, Premium or subscription, and neither do the scorers I searched. But verification still appears elsewhere: the reply ranking features include author_verified, which is consistent with "reply prioritization." And the account credibility job, user-cred-v2, defines isPremium as any blue, gold or grey verification or Verified Organization status, then uses only those accounts as the starting mass for its PageRank. My read: the code is more consistent with the help page than people often assume. What the docs never said is that in 2023, the For You feed itself had default multipliers of 4x and 2x for verified authors, and they don't say today what replaced them. A subscriber still cannot tell, from X's own pages, what their money changes in ranking.

9.2 One word, two products

Said: "Premium: Includes all Basic features plus a checkmark, reduced ads..." at $8/month in the US (help page, Oct 10, 2026). Shipped: "Premium | $30/month | The benefits of SuperGrok, Cursor Pro, and X Premium+" (The X Subscription).

9.3 Marketing vs. terms

Said: X adds "a checkmark, creator tools, and fewer ads" (The X Subscription); help page: "largest reply prioritization" for Premium+ (help page). Signed: "We make no guarantee as to the nature, quality, or value of a Paid Service" (Purchaser Terms, section 3).

9.4 "Transparency" vs. what is published

Said: "our aim is for the public to be able to understand how posts are distributed on X, so they can audit, critique or even help improve the system" (x-algorithm README). Shipped: the same section lists what is withheld: "Grox prompts" and "Some botmaker rules," to reduce gaming (same README, lines 432 to 433). To be fair, this one is disclosed by X itself, with a reason and a compensating tool. I include it because "open source algorithm" is how it is often described, and "mostly open, with named exceptions" is the accurate version.

9.5 The rebrand vs. the stack

Said: Twitter is X, since July 2023. Shipped: developer.twitter.com serves the "X Developer Platform" without redirecting (my check, October 14, 2026), and the Create Posts docs still reference api.twitter.com error URIs.

1. So: Titanic or Phoenix?

Honestly? Neither, yet. And that is the problem. Nothing I could verify says X is sinking. I don't have audited user numbers, and I won't pretend to. What I can verify is this. The engine room is being rebuilt, and parts of it are more open than anything Twitter published before 2023. The ranking code is public, explained and dated. Pay-per-use API pricing is fairer to small developers. The new bundle, on paper, gives more for less. The hull is another story. Help pages describe a lineup that is being replaced. "Premium" means two prices. A developer portal still lives on the old domain. Two repositories each claim to be the algorithm. The terms guarantee nothing about value. And a customer who asks "who runs X?" gets a list of names from press articles, not an answer from the company. A product must satisfy its customers. That's the whole job. And clarity is part of the product: what you're buying, from whom, what it does, and who is accountable when it doesn't. A phoenix rises from its ashes. It doesn't leave them lying around for the customers to sweep up. The engine says Phoenix. The documentation still says Titanic. The good news is that documentation is the easiest part to fix.

Open questions to X

I'd genuinely welcome answers to these, from anyone at X or SpaceXSI. Does a paid subscription change how my posts rank in For You today? If yes, by how much, and where is it in xai-org/x-algorithm? If no, what replaced the 4.0 and 2.0 multipliers from 2023? Which "Premium" is the help center describing? When will help.x.com reflect The X Subscription, and will one of the two products be renamed? Who is accountable for X as a product today? Is there a CEO of X, or is X now run as a product line inside SpaceXSI? Which algorithm repository is authoritative? Will twitter/the-algorithm be archived or point to its successor? When will the migration be finished? Is there a plan to retire developer.twitter.com and the api.twitter.com references in the docs?

Sources

All links opened and checked on October 14, 2026. Pages marked (index) blocked automated fetching; their content was confirmed through a search index copy of the page.

Company and primary sources

SpaceX, Form 10-Q note on mergers (SEC): https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026052535/R10.htm

X Purchaser Terms of Service: https://legal.x.com/purchaser-terms.html

X Help Center, About X Premium, archived Jan 1, 2025: https://web.archive.org/web/20250101081244/https://help.x.com/en/using-x/x-premium X Help Center, About X Premium, archived Oct 10, 2026: https://web.archive.org/web/20261010222207/https://help.x.com/en/using-x/x-premium

Introducing The X Subscription: https://x.ai/news/x-subscription

Announcing Grok: https://x.ai/news/grok

Grok 4 (SuperGrok Heavy): https://x.ai/news/grok-4

Cursor is now a part of SpaceX: https://cursor.com/blog/joining-spacex

X Developer Guidelines: https://docs.x.com/developer-guidelines

X Developer Policy: https://docs.x.com/developer-terms/policy

X API, Make Your First Request: https://docs.x.com/x-api/getting-started/make-your-first-request

X API, Create Posts: https://docs.x.com/x-api/posts/create-post

Code

xai-org/x-algorithm (commit 17c96bf, Oct 14, 2026): https://github.com/xai-org/x-algorithm

twitter/the-algorithm: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm

ScoredTweetsParam.scala at July 2023 commit 72eda9a: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/72eda9a24f815f6d566818cbf8518138e29d83e9/home-mixer/server/src/main/scala/com/twitter/home_mixer/product/scored_tweets/param/ScoredTweetsParam.scala#L300-L313 ScoredTweetsParam.scala at Sept 2025 commit c54bec0: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/c54bec0d4e029fe34926ef3258a86ccacc0d0182/home-mixer/server/src/main/scala/com/twitter/home_mixer/product/scored_tweets/param/ScoredTweetsParam.scala

Reporting and analysis

Reuters, Twitter says 50% of staff laid off (Nov 4, 2022) (index): https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-exec-says-50-employees-lost-jobs-following-acquisition-2022-11-04/ Reuters, Twitter lays off staff (Nov 4, 2022) (index): https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-start-layoffs-friday-morning-internal-email-2022-11-04/ AP, Twitter layoffs begin (index): https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-twitter-inc-business-layoffs-c0334da78b3af9faf2f43cf3f6e52ffa The Verge, Twitter Blue with verification is live (Nov 9, 2022): https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/9/23448317/elon-musk-twitter-blue-verification-live-ios The Verge, free API ending (Feb 2, 2023): https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/2/23582615/twitter-removing-free-api-developer-apps-price-announcement The Verge, new API tiers (Mar 30, 2023): https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/30/23662832/twitter-api-tiers-free-bot-novelty-accounts-basic-enterprice-monthly-price CNN, Twitter rebrands to X (Jul 24, 2023): https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/24/tech/twitter-rebrands-x-elon-musk-hnk-intl Reuters, X logo is here (Jul 24, 2023) (index): https://www.reuters.com/technology/bird-has-flown-musk-twitter-ceo-yaccarino-say-x-logo-is-here-2023-07-24/ Cointelegraph, Twitter Blue rebranded X Premium (Aug 7, 2023): https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-twitter-blue-rebrand-x-premium Business Insider, the most difficult CEO job (Aug 2023): https://www.businessinsider.com/linda-yaccarino-elon-musk-twitter-x-most-difficult-ceo-job-2023-8 TechCrunch, Yaccarino at Code Conference (Sep 28, 2023): https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/28/its-not-clear-x-ceo-linda-yaccarino-knew-about-elon-musks-plan-to-charge-for-x/ TechCrunch, X raises Basic API price (Oct 30, 2024): https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/30/x-makes-its-basic-api-tier-more-costly-launches-annual-subscriptions/ Social Media Today, X increases API fees (Oct 27, 2024) (index): https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/x-formerly-twitter-increases-api-access-fees/731151/ CNBC, xAI acquires X (Mar 28, 2025): https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/28/elon-musk-says-xai-has-acquired-x-in-deal-that-values-social-media-site-at-33-billion.html NBC News, Yaccarino steps down (Jul 9, 2025): https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/linda-yaccarino-steps-down-ceo-x-rcna217741

BBC, Yaccarino departs (Jul 9, 2025): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2gy3j9xq6o

New York Times, X chief says she is leaving (Jul 9, 2025) (index): https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/09/technology/linda-yaccarino-x-steps-down.html Fast Company, X has been CEO-less for months (Sep 2025) (index): https://www.fastcompany.com/91400921/x-ceo-linda-yaccarino-replacement-betting-markets Buffer, Does X Premium really boost your reach? (Oct 2, 2025): https://buffer.com/resources/x-premium-review/ CNBC, SpaceX acquiring xAI (Feb 2, 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/02/elon-musk-spacex-xai-ipo.html Reuters, SpaceX acquires xAI (Feb 2, 2026) (index): https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-spacex-merge-with-xai-combined-valuation-125-trillion-bloomberg-news-2026-02-02/ MediaNama, X API pay-per-use (Feb 2026): https://www.medianama.com/2026/02/223-x-developer-api-pricing-pay-per-use-model/ Business Insider, SpaceX right to buy Cursor (Apr 21, 2026): https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-cursor-coding-xai-deal-acquisition-2026-4 Reuters, SpaceX to buy Anysphere for $60 billion (Jun 16, 2026) (index): https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/spacex-buy-anysphere-60-billion-2026-06-16/ TechCrunch, Nikita Bier steps down (Aug 5, 2026): https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/05/nikita-bier-steps-down-as-xs-head-of-product/ The Verge, Nikita Bier is leaving (Aug 5, 2026): https://www.theverge.com/tech/975955/x-twitter-nikita-bier-leaving TeslaNorth, Elon Musk to rename SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI (Oct 4, 2026): https://teslanorth.com/2026/10/04/elon-musk-spacexai-spacexsi-rename/ TeslaNorth, SpaceXAI's X account is now SpaceXSI (Oct 10, 2026): https://teslanorth.com/2026/10/10/spacexai-spacexsi-x-rename/ TechCrunch, SpaceXSI bundles X Premium, Grok and Cursor (Oct 13, 2026): https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/13/spacexsi-bundles-x-premium-grok-and-cursor-into-one-subscription/ Engadget, X bundles Premium, Grok and Cursor (Oct 13, 2026): https://www.engadget.com/2284943/x-subscription-bundles-premium-grok-cursor/